Sunday, July 8, 2012

The Seed, the Roots, the Fruit, and the History of Racial Politics in America


Written by Brian Ganges, Deputy Editor ~ Brotha Magazine


The purpose of this article is to bring awareness of the forgotten past to the present-day black community. I believe that understanding a proper historical perspective will help us to correct some of our thinking, and it will help to clear up some of the misconceptions that have plagued our community for so long. For most of the 20th century until the present, the black community has been the group that has given unbridled allegiance to the Democratic Party. My main questions to the black community are: Why do most of us support the Democrats, and how is this support benefitting our community? Some supporters of the Democratic Party might respond, “Well, there are no perfect political parties. Besides, I’d rather support the Democrats, who care about the poor, than those racist Tea Partiers and Republicans?” I’m not telling anyone which group to support. My goal is to bring everyone’s political bias or level of favoritism to zero, and based upon the facts and one’s core values system, each person can force the Democrats, the Republicans, or some other group to earn his/her support, rather than expect his/her support.


In this article, I will provide some historical facts for your personal consideration. After taking an objective look at and verifying all of the information presented, if the Democratic Party is still your Party of choice, then at least you were honest and bold enough to take the intellectual challenge; and I can respect that. But as it stands today, the black community has a very dysfunctional relationship with the Democratic Party. It’s a relationship in which the Democrats get and expect the black community to deliver 90%+ nationwide support for every major election cycle; and there is no incentive for the Democrats to make a case to win us over, because they already have us. That is a recipe for disaster, and we have been traditionally setting ourselves up for the Democrats to take advantage of us, to take us for granted, and to throw proverbial crumbs of appeasement at us if we get disgruntled. This political climate has got to change.


I know that many of us have our signature issues that really press our buttons, such as: education, job creation/unemployment, healthcare, etc. But too often, many of us get into a political comfort zone and just coast along with the status quo because everyone who looks like us is following a certain line of thinking. That is a sign that we have turned off our “thinking caps” and we have quit engaging in the political process. We can’t adopt the beehive mentality and go-along-to-get-along any longer; we must stay engaged and get more informed with our core (moral) values and principles in tact.


I will admit that I intentionally wrote this as a one-sided article, and I will make some points regarding some very sensitive historical facts. The reason for this one-sided presentation is because the black community has had such a lob-sided bias towards the Democratic Party for so long, that I had to make a serious statement in order to get people’s attention. I hope that the content of this article causes each person to read and to research the points objectively so that the true spirit in which I am writing this article is captured. I know that it is easy to misrepresent people or things, or to put them into a terrible light. But again, please believe that my goal is NOT to be disingenuous, but to bring everyone’s bias or level of favoritism to zero. At that point, we will have a more level political playing field, we can make our politicians earn our support, and then we can make more informed decisions.


Dissent, debate, and compromise are all a part of the political spectrum, and whether you agree with one side or not, civil discussion is healthy for the political process. I’m sure that we would all agree that neither Party has the black community’s best interests at heart. More importantly, both Parties have consistently proven to us that neither Party has the American people’s best interest at heart. But it is interesting to note that when free blacks were first allowed to vote, their descendants and they did so (overwhelmingly) in favor of the Republican Party for decades. Today, the results in the black community are just the opposite. As I mentioned earlier, the black community supports the Democratic Party at 90%+ levels nationwide, and has done so for many decades. Why is that? Well, let’s look at some of the seeds and the historical roots of the Democratic Party and let’s ask that question again later, because seeds and roots always produce a tree that produces fruit.

The seeds and the roots of the Democratic Party:

1.      In the 19th century, the black community was grateful to President Abraham Lincoln and the Republicans for the Emancipation Proclamation. As a result, blacks voted for the Republican Party for decades. But did you know that the Democratic South opposed the 15th Amendment (granting blacks the right to vote)? So the reaction of many white Southerners was the creation of the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) to either stop blacks from voting for Republicans, or to force them to vote for Democrats. Many modern-day folks look at Republicans like David Duke as the symbol of the KKK But history is crystal clear regarding the KKK and its creator.


2.      Did you know that many abolitionists of the 19th century helped to form the Republican Party to combat the Pro-Slavery agenda of the Democratic Party? Slavery was an integral part of the Southern economy, and Democrats were not going to let their slaves go without a fight.


3.      Did you know that the Black Codes (later called Jim Crow laws), which were enacted by many Democratic states, were created in order to minimize the freedoms and economic opportunities of blacks after the 13th Amendment (the abolition of slavery) was passed?


4.      Did you know that Southern Democrats instituted poll taxes and subjective literacy tests to restrict the voting rights of poor and/or undereducated blacks?


5.      Did you know that the grandfather clause was enacted by several Southern Democratic states to deny blacks the right to vote? The clause stated that a person whose father or grandfather was registered to vote prior to the passage of the 15th Amendment, would be exempt from educational, property, or tax requirements for voting. Since the former slaves had not been granted the right to vote until 1870, this clause worked exclusively to exclude blacks from voting, while it assured the right to many impoverished and illiterate whites. In 1915, (Republican justices of) the U.S. Supreme Court declared the grandfather clause unconstitutional because it was in violation of the 15th Amendment.


6.      Did you know that Anti-Civil Rights Legislation was the creation of the Democratic Party? Did you also know that the President was a Democrat, and there was a 2/3 Democratic majority in the U.S. House and the U.S. Senate during the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Act of 1965? Did you know that there wasn’t enough Democratic support (with a clear majority in both Houses of Congress) to pass either piece of legislation without Republican help? And the Republicans are called racists?


7.      Did you know that the Democratic justices on the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in the Dred Scott Decision that blacks were not U.S. citizens?


8.      Did you know that the Democratic Party historically opposed the 13th Amendment (abolition of slavery), the 14th Amendment (citizenship for blacks) and the 15th Amendment (issued blacks the right to vote)? But today, black support for the Democrats is through the roof.


9.      Did you know that The Three-Fifths Compromise in Article 1, Section 2, and Paragraph 3 of the U.S. Constitution states that three-fifths of the enumerated population of slaves would be counted for representation purposes regarding both the distribution of taxes and the apportionment of the members of the U.S. House of Representatives? The Compromise never meant that blacks were 3/5 of a person. Rather, it meant that since the Democratic South didn’t want to count the black slaves as people, the North made it harder for the South to send more Pro-Slavery representatives to Washington. Under normal circumstances, for a population of 30,000 there was 1 person sent to be a member of the U.S. House of Representatives. Under the 3/5 Compromise, for a population of 50,000 there was 1 person sent to be a member of the U.S. House of Representatives. (For the sake of clarity) For a non-slavery population of 150,000, that district would send 5 representatives to Washington. For a pro-slavery Southern population of 150,000, that district would send 3 representatives to Washington. In essence, the 3/5 Compromise was an anti-slavery compromise in order for the Northern lawmakers to fight the racist Southern Democratic agenda.


10.  Did you know that Democratic President Franklin D. Roosevelt appointed Senator Hugo Black, a known and admitted Klansman at the time, to the Supreme Court in order to help solidify the South as part of the Democratic coalition?


11.  Did you know that Margaret Sanger, the founder of the 1939 Negro Project and Planned Parenthood, set out to recruit black ministers and doctors in her efforts to spread her message of population reduction, contraception, sterilization, and abortion among the “less fit”, “inferior races” such as “Negroes” in the early 20th century? She referred to blacks, immigrants, and others as “human weeds, reckless breeders, spawning . . . human beings who never should have been born.” Sanger also stated, “The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We do not want the word to get out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it occurs to any of their more rebellious members.” She also was an inspiration to Adolf Hitler in his views of eugenics and “murdering socially undesirable people.” Today, the barbaric abortion agenda is disproportionately pushed in the black community (by the Democrats) as if it is a normal and caring practice. As a result, the black community is approximately 13% of the U.S. population, but black babies account for more than a third of all abortions performed in this country. Millions of black babies have been murdered since the 1970’s. These are bad seeds and bad roots that are giving us bad trees and bad fruit.


12.  Did you know that most of the founders of the Texas Republican Party were black?


13.  Did you know that Malcolm X reprimanded the black community in parts of his April 12, 1964 “Ballot or the Bullet” speech? Mostly speaking to black Americans about black nationalism, he said:  “The Democrats have been in Washington D.C. only because of the Negro vote...You put them first, and they put you last, 'cause you're a chump, a political chump…The Party that you backed (the Democrats) controls two-thirds of the House of Representatives and the Senate, and still they can't keep their promise to you, 'cause you're a chump. Anytime you throw your weight behind a political party that controls two-thirds of the government, and that Party can't keep the promise that it made to you during election time, and you're dumb enough to walk around continuing to identify yourself with that Party, you're not only a chump, but you're a traitor to your race… You, today, are in the hands of a government of segregationists, racists, white supremacists who belong to the Democratic Party, but disguise themselves as Dixiecrats. A Dixiecrat is nothing but a Democrat…These Northern Democrats are in cahoots with the Southern Democrats. They’re playing a giant con game, a political con game…Whenever the Negroes keep the Democrats in power, they’re keeping the Dixiecrats in power. Is this true? A vote for a Democrat is nothing but a vote for a Dixiecrat.” I wonder if anyone will call Malcolm X an Uncle Tom or a sell out.


14.  Did you know that Democratic President Woodrow Wilson arranged for a private White House screening of the Pro-KKK movie Birth of a Nation? He also enacted pro-segregation policies within his administration via his appointed department heads, and he made it a felony for blacks and whites to marry in Washington D.C.


15.  Did you know that many of today’s news programs and the political pundits who favor the Democratic Party are quick to label their opponents as racists? After reading these points, no Democratic supporter should ever play the race card or call anyone a racist again.


16.  Did you know that the Democratic President Franklin D. Roosevelt and his New Deal and the Democratic President Lyndon B. Johnson and his Great Society helped to decrease the number of black nuclear families in the U.S., and to increase the number of black people in the welfare system? Some families were helped temporarily by some of these Government programs. But many families have become the victims of these programs and are now generational recipients of Government assistance. What is the big picture fruit that the black community has received (as a whole) from the seeds, the roots and the tree of the Democratic Party?

 
Now, if this short list of historical punches to the eye doesn’t raise a few questions in your mind about the relationship between the Democratic Party and black people, then you are not being objective. This list could have easily been fifty points long. How can the Democratic Party and their undisputed racist history command such loyalty from the very people they have historically been oppressing? This kind of reminds me of the Stockholm Syndrome, a condition in which the victims support, love, defend, and/or emotionally bond with their abusers and controllers.


Many of you might be thinking, “The issues addressed in this article are from decades and centuries ago. Everyone makes mistakes, and we should all be willing to forgive the past and give folks a chance to learn and grow from the mistakes of their predecessors. Why don’t you just let the past be the past?” Right? Well, let’s be consistent. Would you buy a house that suffered flood damage or had known structural damage? Would you let the past be the past in that instance? Would you buy a car that was once totaled? Just let the past be the past. Right? Would you let your daughter marry Charles Manson? That was years ago; get over it. Right? What about an abusive husband that almost kills his wife but he continually tells her that he loves her? People can change. Right? Again, let’s be consistent and let’s think about this information. When people look for jobs, they send a resume (a snapshot of their professional past), and the employer uses that information as a consideration regarding one’s potential employment. When people want to finance a car, the dealership and/or the lending institution will pull their credit (a snapshot of their financial past), and they will make a determination based upon that information. Why do we judge everything by the past except our allegiance to the Democratic Party? Why, because the Democrats care about us now?

We have a moral obligation to hold our elected officials and political parties accountable, and much of the fruit that is blossoming today is a result of the seeds and the roots of yesterday. We might not be able to blame today’s politicians for the sins of the Party members from the 19th and the 20th centuries, and I sure don’t want to hear another tired apology for slavery and discrimination. But what we can and must do is examine the fruit of today’s political agendas and verify whether or not this fruit is a result of those bad seeds and roots. If we don’t, then we will continue to get flawed results with good intentions. If we like what we have been getting, then let’s continue on the current path.

This article does put the Democrats in a bad light, and if we supported the Republicans to the degree that we do the Democrats with the same past as the Democrats, then this article would focus solely upon the Republicans. But those of you who are black and die-hard Democrats, you have to come to terms with your political roots. You also have to ask yourself if history is important, and if history is in any way connected to the present. Moreover, don’t mistake the points listed above as a gold star for the Republicans because they are so good, and a sentence to Hell for the Democrats because they are all bad. That is not the case at all, because both Parties have done some good things and some bad things. We just have to put some things into perspective and analyze whether we are getting a favorable return on our political investment or not. We have to ask “Why” and “How” more often. How did the political transition in the black community occur from the Republicans to the Democrats? And why? We need to ask more questions, do some more research, and let’s continue to have an intellectual discussion so that we can be more informed as we move forward. Hopefully, this article will get you to see some things in a new light.

Tuesday, June 5, 2012

A Life Worth Looking At

Therefore let those who suffer according to the will of God commit their souls to Him in doing good, as to a faithful Creator. 1 Peter 4:19 (NKJV)
God knows how we work. The Bible refers to Him as our faithful Creator, and in the original Greek, the word for Creator can also carry the connotation of inventor. God made mankind (Genesis 1:27), and therefore, He's thoroughly familiar with the way we're wired and what makes us tick.

This being the case, He also knows that one of the most effective ways for us to learn is through examples. Consider the number of examples He's preserved for us in His Word. Genesis barely gets started before we're confronted with the examples of Noah, Abraham, Jacob, and Joseph. This pattern continues as the biblical narrative follows the lives of Moses, Joshua, Gideon, and Ruth. In the New Testament, we're introduced to Peter, Paul, John, and Mary. And the ultimate objective of the Bible is to draw our attention to the peerless example set by Jesus Christ Himself who also suffered for us, leaving us an example, that you should follow His steps... (1 Peter 2:21 NKJV).

Because examples are powerful teaching tools, we'll focus on one of the most inspiring, instructive, and interesting examples the world has ever witnessed. The life of David touches just about every human emotion, triumph, and failure. He possessed the sensitivity of a poet and the strength of a fearsome warrior. He ascended from virtual anonymity to the pinnacle of prestige and power. He succumbed to sin and was plunged into the depths of disgrace, only to experience God's remarkable restoration.

There's a lot to be learned from David's example because it shows us both what to do and what not to do. It provides us with a pattern for spiritual success and a sober warning against the subtle strength of sin. It reveals how God deeply loves a man whose heart is imperfect. And that's an example we can all relate to.

Think About It…






Monday, May 14, 2012

Approachable People



For a bishop must be blameless, as a steward of God, not self-willed, not quick-tempered.... Titus 1:7 (NKJV)

As Paul continued with his list of pastoral prerequisites, he wrote that a bishop mustn't be quick-tempered. A more contemporary way of putting this would be that a pastor shouldn't have a short fuse. He shouldn't be the sort of person who's prone to being angered easily but should have a high tolerance for hassles and difficulties. Something is spiritually "off" when a minister constantly loses his composure, because an angry attitude doesn't accomplish God's righteousness:

So then, my beloved brethren, let every man be swift to hear, slow to speak, slow to wrath; for the wrath of man does not produce the righteousness of God. James 1:19-20 (NKJV)

This doesn't mean that a pastor should never be angry. In fact, the Bible acknowledges there are certain situations where anger (without sin) is an appropriate response (Ephesians 4:26). But Paul was talking about something different here. He was referring to the kind of anger that defines a person's character. The sad effect is that people no longer feel the freedom to approach their pastor when they should. I can't ask a question like that because he'll chew me up and spit me out! I can't confess that sin because I'll get blasted. A pastor ought to address and confront sin when necessary, but he should also be approachable.

Jesus was approachable. People weren't afraid He'd "go ballistic" on them when it came to their sins. In fact, there were several occasions when people felt the freedom to interrupt Him with their problems (John 4:47; Mark 7:25; Matthew 17:14; Luke 18:38). We're also told that parents were comfortable with Jesus handling their little children (Matthew 19:13). None of this would have happened if Jesus had the reputation of being a hot-tempered man.

Let's take it one step further and ask ourselves whether we're quick tempered. But Pastor Bob, I'm not planning on being a pastor anytime soon. It doesn't matter. All of us, as Christians, are called to walk as Jesus walked (1 John 2:6).

Our Lord wasn't easily angered but instead projected a sense of approachability and accessibility, and so should we.

Think About It…

Answai T. White, B.S., M.Div.




Wednesday, May 2, 2012

Bouts of Doubt


In hope of eternal life which God, who cannot lie, promised before time began.... Titus 1:2 (NKJV)

It all starts with God's character. That's what Paul understood as he wrote what we would come to know as the book of Titus. In this brief, three-chapter epistle, the apostle penned a plethora of precious promises. But he knew these would just be words on a piece of parchment unless they were backed up by something more substantial than the moral fiber of man. Therefore, he directed Titus' attention to the fact that God is the One behind these promises and that He cannot lie.

Titus needed to be reminded of this truth, and so do we. The circumstances of our lives are beyond our control and constantly changing. As they do, we may be tempted to question God's character: If God is so good, why did He let that person pass away? Where was He when I needed Him most? How am I supposed to trust Him again? We ask ourselves these questions from time to time when faced with seasons of uncertainty in life.

But we can always be sure of this: God cannot lie, which means He will never go back on His Word, and we can always trust what it tells us. We can trust that the Lord will never leave or forsake us (Hebrews 13:5), He will be with us until the end of this age (Matthew 28:20), and His ways are always just and true (Revelation 15:3). God is forever faithful, and if He can be trusted to make good on a promise as important as eternal life, He can surely be trusted in matters pertaining to this life.
God's impeccable character is the basis of the book of Titus, and it's also the unshakable foundation of our lives. When we find ourselves going through a bout of doubt, we need to know what God has promised in His Word and remember that His promises must be true because He cannot lie.

It is impossible for God to lie.... Hebrews 6:18 (NKJV)
Think About It…

Answai T. White, B.S., M.Div.




Monday, March 19, 2012

Crisis is a Catalyst

There was a certain nobleman whose son was sick...he went to Him [Jesus] and implored Him to come down and heal his son, for he was at the point of death. John 4:46-47 (NKJV)

Imagine you're the nobleman in this passage. Your beloved son is seriously sick; in fact, he's on the brink of dying. Helplessness and hopelessness begin to overwhelm you. But then you hear that there's a Man about twenty miles away who has a reputation for miraculously healing people. His name is Jesus, and you pursue Him in hopes of convincing Him to come heal your son.

The clock is ticking, and after an anxious journey you finally find yourself face to face with Jesus. You share your need and ask Him to return with you to your son's bedside. But Jesus' answer catches you off guard, "Go on back home. Your son is OK."

This father takes Jesus at His word, turns around, and makes the return trip home. Along the way, some of his servants intercept him with good news, "Your son has been healed!" He asks when this happened, and it becomes clear the healing occurred at the same time Jesus pronounced his son to be well, over twenty miles away! In response, the nobleman and his entire household believe in Jesus, recognizing He's much more than a mere man (John 4:53).

Now notice the progression. The crisis of the son's sickness became the catalyst for spiritual salvation. If the son had never gotten sick, then the nobleman and his household would not have placed their faith in Jesus. But because the son was so close to death, a chain reaction was set off that eventually led not only to the physical blessing of physical healing, but the eternal blessing of eternal salvation through faith in Christ.

Crisis is often the catalyst God uses to accomplish His good-and greater works in our lives. It comes to us as an unwelcome guest but fulfills a key role as the Lord uses it to work all things together for our good.

Think About It…

Answai T. White, B.S., M.Div.

Monday, March 12, 2012

He Can

With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26 (NKJV)

As we come to a principle as profound as the one presented to us in Romans 8:28, we need to begin with a basic understanding about something: God's ability to make good on the claim to work all things together for the ultimate good of His people. If we don't believe God is actually able to do this, then we'll have a hard time believing He actually will.

That's an uncertainty we don't need to be held captive by because the Bible tells us two things about God that prove His ability to fulfill Romans 8:28.

First, the Bible tells us that God is omniscient. "Omni" means all, and "science" means to know. There is nothing that can be known that is not known by God. He's fully aware of every event and happening that has ever taken place from one end of the universe to the other. He has absolute awareness of every fact and factor. The atomic number of hydrogen, the height of the Empire State Building , the way your co-worker looks at you, the crack in the driveway six doors down, the thoughts you're thinking as you read this...God knows it all.

Secondly, Scripture also assures us that God is omnipotent. Again, "omni" means all, and "potence" means power. God is all-powerful. When He determines to do something, there is no question about it being done because His power knows no limitations. The earth needs the sun to sustain life, and God is able to provide it according to His power. Mankind requires redemption, and God's power provides it. No matter how massive or monumental the task, God's power is always sufficient.

Now, put these two attributes together and you can see how God is able to work all things together for our good. He knows every detail about everything happening in our lives, and His limitless power allows Him to control them in a way that always benefits us in the end. Regardless of how impossible things might seem, all things are possible with the God who is able to use them for our good.

Think About It…

Answai T. White, B.S., M.Div.

Friday, March 9, 2012

How's Your Vision?

How’s your vision?

The next day, as they went on their journey and drew near the city, Peter went up on the housetop to pray, about the sixth hour. Then he became very hungry and wanted to eat; but while they made ready, he fell into a trance Acts 10:9-10 (NKJV)

Yesterday, we discussed how Paul received a vision of a man begging for his help in Macedonia . This vision was instrumental in Paul discerning a door that God had opened for him. But this isn't the only instance where God used a vision to reveal His will.

In Acts Chapter 10, Peter went to the top of a house to pray, where he suddenly fell into a trance and was given a vision by God. Up to that point, Peter had assumed Jesus came to save Jews but not Gentiles. The vision God gave Peter showed him it was just as much God's will for Gentiles to be saved through faith in Christ as it was Jews (Acts 10:11-16).

It was an important step forward in God's will for both Peter and the Church.

"So, should I expect my life to be filled with visions?" Let's go back to that word trance, which is "a condition where a person's normal state of mind is temporarily suspended." While we see that a vision can be biblical, we also need to see that by very definition it's not normal.

Here's the balance we need to strike when it comes to visions: We need to be open to the possibility that God may use them in our lives, but we need to temper this with the understanding that they are unusual.

It's a big red flag if someone is constantly talking about a "vision" or "revelation" God gave him or her. Again, it's not the norm. However, if someone with the reputation of being stable-minded receives something similar to what Peter and Paul experienced, and if it doesn't contradict anything we see in scripture, then it's quite possible God gave it to them.

Visions should never be the primary or only means of discerning God's will, but they can be used to get us to see things God's way.


Think about it…


Answai T. White, B.S., M.Div.